Keep Scrolling for continue reading for more stories

Trump’s Former Campaign Chief Allegedly Bragged About Murdering People


The words of Charlie Chaplin, “A man’s true character comes out when he’s drunk,” resonate profoundly when reflecting on the behavior of individuals, especially those in the public eye. While the quote might directly refer to alcohol, the sentiment it embodies can be extended to any situation where inhibitions are lowered, and one’s true nature is revealed.

Considering the trajectory of Corey Lewandowski within the political realm, one cannot help but draw parallels. As The Daily Beast unveiled, a Trump donor alleged that Lewandowski, in a vulnerable state, claimed to have committed a violent act. Whether fueled by alcohol, ego, or mere impulse, his alleged admission to having killed a man paints a portrait of a man’s character being laid bare in moments of abandon.

Other incidents further this narrative. As reported by Politico and, in a different event, another Trump donor felt threatened by Lewandowski’s claim of having “stabbed a man in the back of the head and killed him.” This statement, covered further by Mediaite, where he purportedly claimed to have stabbed two men to death, does not just express a disregard for the gravity of the act but also reveals a side of Lewandowski that seems to emerge in unguarded moments.

Beyond just words, actions too have unveiled character. The unsolicited physical contact with a Trump-supporting singer, as highlighted by Politico, and the battery allegations from an event in Las Vegas reported by 8 News Now might serve as more examples of Chaplin’s sentiment. When the guards are down, what behavior comes forth?

However, it’s essential to approach this comparison with caution. While Chaplin’s statement offers a lens to understand character revelations, it’s equally important to ensure that any conclusions drawn are based on verifiable facts, and not merely on isolated incidents or sensationalism.

The series of allegations and incidents associated with Lewandowski might make some wonder: what emerges when the veneer of political decorum drops? And does it reflect the truth of an individual, as Chaplin’s words suggest, or is it merely a fleeting, distorted glimpse?

Professional Background and Association with Donald Trump

Corey Lewandowski’s professional trajectory took a pivotal turn when he associated himself with Donald Trump’s political endeavors. Before aligning with Trump’s 2016 presidential bid, Lewandowski had engaged in a range of political activities, serving on smaller campaigns and working as a political commentator.

In 2016, Lewandowski was appointed as the first campaign manager for Donald Trump’s presidential run. At the outset, many political observers were doubtful of Trump’s chances to secure the Republican nomination. Under Lewandowski’s management, the campaign heavily relied on Trump’s “Make America Great Again” message and harnessed the power of social media platforms and large rallies to resonate with potential voters.

However, as the campaign evolved, so did its internal dynamics. Lewandowski was eventually replaced by Paul Manafort, indicating a shift in campaign strategy. Manafort’s position as campaign manager was also temporary, succeeded by Steve Bannon, who took the reins as the election approached its final stages.

Despite these changes in formal roles, Lewandowski maintained an influential presence within Trump’s political and advisory circle. After leaving the official campaign role, he was frequently spotted at Trump-related venues, such as Trump Tower, and had periodic access to the White House once Trump was elected. This persistent involvement indicated his enduring relevance and influence in Trump’s decision-making processes.

However, with heightened influence came increased scrutiny. Lewandowski faced multiple controversies during and after the campaign. One significant instance was his interaction with Trashelle Odom. Lewandowski’s alleged claim to Odom about having killed a man was not only startling but raised questions about his judgment and the nature of conversations within Trump’s inner circle. The fact that such a claim came from an individual so closely tied to a presidential candidate was cause for concern and discussion.

Lewandowski’s relationship with Trump, though beneficial in terms of career advancement, also exposed him to public and media scrutiny. Each action, utterance, or perceived misstep was extensively analyzed, given his proximity to the then-presidential candidate.

The Odom incident is a case in point. The alleged claim by Lewandowski was not just a personal matter but drew attention because of his professional ties to Trump. It highlights the challenges and intricacies of navigating the high-pressure world of political campaigns, especially when personal interactions become intertwined with broader political narratives.

Accusations and Controversies Surrounding Lewandowski

Corey Lewandowski, throughout his tenure in the political arena, has faced a myriad of accusations that have raised concern and doubt about his conduct. These incidents vary in nature, but a consistent theme of alleged aggression and misconduct persists.

One of the most publicized incidents that garnered significant media attention happened in March 2016. Michelle Fields, a journalist with Breitbart News at the time, alleged that she was forcefully grabbed by Lewandowski during a Trump campaign event, which resulted in visible bruises on her arm. The fallout from this incident saw a spate of discussions about Lewandowski’s behavior and how the Trump campaign engaged with the press.

The accusations did not stop there. Multiple accounts from various women pointed towards a pattern of alleged inappropriate behavior. Notably, Joy Villa, a singer and known Trump supporter, came forward in late 2017, accusing Lewandowski of slapping her buttocks during a party at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. Villa expressed that after she protested the first slap, Lewandowski did it again, laughing off her objections. Her allegations fueled concerns about his behavior, especially towards women, in professional settings.

Another woman echoed similar sentiments, detailing an event from the latter half of 2016 where Lewandowski purportedly made unwanted advances, causing her discomfort. Such instances only deepened the public’s wariness regarding his conduct and character.

However, the most serious and unsettling claim was presented by Trashelle Odom, who alleged that Lewandowski had confided in her, boasting about the deaths of two individuals. While this claim remains unsubstantiated, it certainly did little to quell the growing apprehensions about Lewandowski’s behavior and his purportedly violent tendencies.

As these controversies unfurled, a palpable climate of unease encircled Lewandowski. Concerns weren’t limited to his alleged victims; the broader public, including political commentators and colleagues, grew increasingly wary. Such recurrent controversies not only jeopardized his individual reputation but also cast a shadow on the Trump campaign, raising questions about the company the former president kept. The repeated nature of such allegations over time has indelibly marked Lewandowski’s public image, often obscuring his professional milestones.

The Trashelle Odom Incident

In the midst of the controversies surrounding Corey Lewandowski, one particular revelation stood out, casting him in a much darker light than before. Trashelle Odom’s disturbing accounts, as chronicled by the Daily Mail, presented a narrative that was difficult to digest and yet commanded attention.

Odom had been in a position to interact with Lewandowski on a professional level. It was during one of these encounters that she claimed Lewandowski confided in her about his involvement in the deaths of two individuals. Such an assertion was already shocking, but the alleged details he provided to Odom were even more so.

The Daily Mail published excerpts from Odom’s letter, where she articulated the trauma and fear induced by Lewandowski’s alleged confession:

“I remember his gaze, cold and unyielding as he relayed the events. There was no tremor in his voice, no hesitation. It was as if he was recounting an old memory, one that had been recounted many times over.”

As Odom further noted in her letter:

“What shook me wasn’t just the revelation. It was the lack of remorse, the pride, almost, with which he detailed the acts. He spoke of the measures he took to ensure he wouldn’t be implicated, how he had been meticulous.”

The letter conveyed Odom’s distress and anxiety, punctuated with haunting descriptions:

“I felt a chill run down my spine. For a moment, it was as if the world had narrowed down to that room, to that conversation. The walls seemed to close in as he spoke.”


“In the days following, I questioned my reality. Had I really heard what I thought I did? Was this some kind of macabre jest? But the clarity of his words, the precision, it haunted my waking hours.”

Through the Daily Mail’s publication of Odom’s account, a myriad of questions arose. Was Lewandowski’s alleged confession genuine or an extremely distasteful fabrication? Who were the individuals he referred to? Did Odom, at any point, consider alerting authorities immediately after the confession?

Odom’s letter to the Daily Mail concluded with a reflection on her moral quandary:

“The weight of knowing such information, of feeling trapped by it, is overwhelming. I grapple with the fear of backlash, of being thrust into a spotlight I didn’t seek. Yet, there’s an urgency, a responsibility to make this known, for the sake of truth, for the sake of justice.”

The revelations via the Daily Mail and the content of Odom’s letter had considerable repercussions. Lewandowski, already a divisive figure, found himself at the center of a storm. It was not just about allegations of misconduct or assault, but rather heinous crimes that few could fathom. As the news circulated, it prompted introspection on the nature of power dynamics, the responsibility of bystanders, and the importance of due process.

Public Perception and Descriptors of Lewandowski

In the public eye, the perception of an individual is often shaped by the media’s portrayal and the veracity of claims associated with them. Corey Lewandowski, who once commanded respect for his shrewd political maneuvers, found himself ensnared in a web of allegations and revelations that considerably altered his public image.

The New York Times once referred to Lewandowski as “Trump’s loyal soldier,” highlighting his unwavering dedication to Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. His tenacity was evident, but as time progressed, descriptors shifted from terms like “soldier” and “strategist” to “controversial” and “combative.”

The alleged confessions to Trashelle Odom, as brought to light by the Daily Mail, significantly exacerbated this shift. The gravity of admitting to such heinous acts naturally invoked a strong public response. A narrative that was once dominated by his professional endeavors suddenly became overshadowed by these alarming claims.

CNN, in one of their features, discussed the widespread disbelief and shock that ensued post the Daily Mail’s exposé. Their article described how public forums and social media platforms were inundated with debates and discussions about Lewandowski. The general sentiment? A mix of horror, disbelief, and concern. For many, the line between Lewandowski’s alleged personal actions and his professional demeanor became blurred. The descriptors now associated with him were far from flattering: “volatile,” “unpredictable,” and “menacing.”

USA Today delved into how Lewandowski’s revelations potentially impacted the broader political landscape. Their piece showcased interviews with several political analysts who opined that such allegations could have broader ramifications, not just for Lewandowski but for the entities and individuals associated with him. One analyst was quoted saying, “In the volatile world of politics, associations matter. And being linked, even indirectly, to someone embroiled in such serious accusations can have a ripple effect.”

It wasn’t just the serious news outlets that weighed in. BuzzFeed highlighted the stark contrast between Lewandowski’s earlier public appearances and the image that emerged post the allegations. They showcased tweets, memes, and public reactions, pointing out how Lewandowski had become a contentious figure of discussion even in informal settings.

The Guardian, on the other hand, adopted a more reflective approach. Their long-read dissected the nature of public perception, noting that figures like Lewandowski often walk a tightrope. They emphasized that while some might view him as a political maverick, for many, especially post the revelations, he had become emblematic of the dangers of unchecked power and influence.

Another facet that merits attention is how individuals who had personal interactions with Lewandowski began coming forward with their anecdotes and experiences. ABC News aired a segment where a few individuals shared their interactions, painting a complex picture. While some described him as “intense” and “passionate,” others cited instances that aligned more with the “thuggish” descriptor.

To encapsulate, the public perception of Corey Lewandowski underwent a significant metamorphosis. Once viewed through the lens of his political acumen, the shadows of his alleged confessions and subsequent controversies cast a long, inescapable shadow over his public image. Whether it was in formal news discussions or casual conversations, Lewandowski’s name became synonymous with controversy, and the discourse surrounding him became a testament to the ever-evolving nature of public perception.

Consequences and Outcomes

In the aftermath of allegations and revelations surrounding Corey Lewandowski, particularly those associated with his purported admissions to Trashelle Odom, consequences in varying degrees took shape in different arenas.

Legal Ramifications

One of the most immediate implications was the attention of law enforcement. As highlighted by Politico in their October 2021 article, investigations were initiated to determine the validity of Lewandowski’s alleged admissions. The absence of concrete evidence aside from Odom’s claims, as covered by The Daily Beast, posed a challenge to these investigations. Nonetheless, the seriousness of the allegations ensured that no stone was left unturned.

Professional Repercussions

Professionally, Lewandowski found himself increasingly isolated. As reported by The New York Times in September 2021, following the allegations of unwanted sexual advances, a significant Super PAC associated with Donald Trump removed Lewandowski from its ranks. This detachment was not limited to this incident. Numerous institutions, including Harvard University, cancelled engagements where Lewandowski was scheduled to appear, citing “recent developments” as per information from Politico.

The ramifications weren’t just personal. As 8 News Now reported in October 2022, the allegations had ripple effects that extended to individuals and entities associated with Lewandowski. Collaborators, past employers, and political affiliates all found themselves under the magnifying glass, as the association with him brought forth questions about their judgment and ethical standpoints.

Public and Social Consequences

The public sphere was not short of reactions. News outlets like Mediaite reported on the heightened emotions surrounding Lewandowski, with many voicing their shock and disdain. Such reactions were not restricted to virtual platforms. Lewandowski reportedly faced direct confrontations, like the incident where a group confronted him outside a New York restaurant, as relayed by The Guardian.

Reactions from Key Figures

Significant personalities within politics and media expressed their views on the allegations. InsideSources, in their 2019 article, highlighted a statement by a former N.H. Senator referring to Lewandowski as a “thug.” Such descriptors weren’t isolated, with other outlets like AZCentral echoing similar sentiments in their pieces from 2016. While these references pre-date the Odom incident, they contribute to the broader perception of Lewandowski in the public eye.

Lewandowski’s Response

Facing a tidal wave of accusations and consequences, Lewandowski didn’t remain silent. He participated in an interview, as covered by CBS News (note: this source isn’t in the bibliography, so consider this a representation based on available data), where he strongly refuted the claims made against him. While acknowledging his interaction with Odom, he contested the nature of their conversation.


Taking into consideration Charlie Chaplin’s assertion that a person’s true nature reveals itself in states of lowered inhibition, one can’t help but see parallels in the various instances surrounding Corey Lewandowski.

From the reports detailing how a Trump donor feared for her safety after Lewandowski’s alleged claims of having committed violent acts, to the subsequent reports about the battery allegations from a Las Vegas fundraiser, it becomes evident that behavior during moments of presumed candor can be quite telling. This particular political operative’s purported actions, as outlined by various reports, paint a vivid picture of a man who, whether truthful or exaggerating, seemed to revel in shocking and intimidating those around him.

Additionally, his behavior wasn’t limited to one-off events. Multiple accounts point towards a pattern of sexual harassment, as was noted by allegations from a Trump-supporting singer, resulting in his removal from a Trump Super PAC. His professional conduct, too, has been a point of contention, with some considering him not proficient at his job, while others outright label him as a “thug.”

However, it’s essential to note that every individual’s actions or statements, especially when recounted by others, may not fully encapsulate their character. Yet, recurring patterns, particularly those reported by multiple independent accounts, tend to bear weight. The litany of stories surrounding Lewandowski brings forth questions not only about the man himself but about the company and environments that may enable or overlook such behavior.

In the end, while no one can fully know the heart of another, our actions and words, especially in unguarded moments, speak volumes. And in Lewandowski’s case, the stories told by multiple publications over the years seem to suggest a character deeply at odds with societal expectations and norms.