Keep Scrolling for continue reading for more stories

The World Could Be On The Precipice Of a Great Power War – The First Since WW2

Today, the specter of a great power war looms large as the United States, along with its allies, navigates the minefield of escalating tensions from the frosty plains of Eastern Europe to the lands of the Middle East, and onto the precarious waters of the Taiwan Strait in the Far East.

In 2021, Japan relayed a disconcerting message to the United States concerning China’s contemplation of a Pearl Harbor-style attack. If accurate, this would have been chilling escalation, reminiscent of audacious strategies of the past that spiraled the world into cataclysmic confrontations.

The world stands at a critical juncture, the decisions made today will echo through the annals of history. The authoritarian axis, with its aligned objectives, presents a clear and present danger to the established world order. The U.S. and its allies are beckoned to reassess their foreign policy strategies, recommit to their alliances, and present a united front against the forces seeking to undermine democracy and global stability.

The actions taken in the near term will carve the legacy for generations to come, and the price of inaction could very well be a legacy of conflict and discord enduring through ages.

II. The Emerging Axis: Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea

The shifting global geopolitical dynamics have given rise to an axis of aggressive nations, seemingly united by shared adversarial stances towards the West, particularly the United States and its allies.

This axis, primarily consisting of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, is believed to challenge the existing world order, aiming to reshape it to favor their strategic ambitions. The interplay between these nations, whether through formal alliances or tacit understandings, is becoming a focal point of international concern.

A. Formation and Objectives of the Russia-China-Iran-North Korea Axis

The formation of this axis can be traced to the nations’ common objective of undermining the U.S.-led global order.

They are bound by mutual interests in challenging the hegemony of the United States and its allies, undermining the rules-based international order, and redrawing the global power map to serve their expansionist ambitions. Their alignment is not merely a fleeting convergence of interests but appears to be a structured, aggressive alliance aimed at altering the global balance of power.

B. Prominent Involvement of Russia and Iran in Ongoing Conflicts

Russia and Iran have become prominent actors in ongoing conflicts, notably in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

Their military interventions in Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine are seen not as independent pursuits, but as part of a broader strategy to assert dominance and challenge the influence of the West in these regions. By employing state-of-the-art weaponry and leveraging proxy elements, these nations are furthering their geopolitical goals and expanding their spheres of influence.

C. Evidence of North Korean Weaponry Used by Hamas

The narrative takes a darker turn with reports of North Korean weaponry finding its way into the arsenals of Hamas militants. This situation underscores the dangerous liaisons among rogue states willing to arm non-state actors to further their strategic objectives, thereby heightening the risks of regional and possibly global conflict.

D. Russia’s Failure to Condemn Hamas’ Attacks and Subsequent Engagement with the Group

Russia’s conspicuous silence following Hamas’ attacks, and its subsequent engagement with the group, adds a layer of complexity to the geopolitical narrative. Rather than a reactionary foreign policy move, Russia’s actions seem to be a calculated strategy aimed at keeping the Middle East embroiled in chaos, thereby diverting global attention and resources from other geopolitical theaters.

E. Expansion of China and Russia’s Partnership

The partnership between China and Russia is tightening, forged not merely on shared adversaries but on a vision of a new world order where they play central roles.

Their military, economic, and political cooperation is deepening, emboldened by the perceived decline of the West and internal disarray among democratic nations. This alliance threatens to undermine the fabric of the international order, challenging the norms and institutions that have maintained a fragile peace since the end of World War II.

The interlinkages among these nations, driven by their strategic interests and adversarial postures towards the West, have led to a complex web of military collaborations and antagonisms. This emerging axis of aggression is painting a grim picture on the global canvas, where the stakes are high, and the actions of these nations in the military domain are reshaping the contours of international relations.

III. Armament and Military Engagements

The dynamics of global conflicts are often significantly impacted by the military engagements and armament strategies adopted by involved nations. The interplay of armaments, military collaborations, and antagonisms among Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea sheds light on the aggressive postures these nations are adopting on the global stage. The following sections delve into specific instances illustrating the military engagements and armament strategies adopted by these nations.

A. Usage of Iranian Armaments by Russia against Ukraine

The military engagements in Eastern Europe, particularly in Ukraine, have seen the utilization of Iranian armaments by Russia. This not only signifies a deeper alliance between Russia and Iran but also reflects a shared objective of challenging the West’s influence and altering the regional power dynamics. The supply of arms, often conducted under the veil of secrecy, is a testament to the aggressive postures adopted by these nations.

B. Russia’s Pursuit of North Korean Weaponry for the Ukrainian Conflict

Further extending the tentacles of military cooperation, Russia has reportedly shown interests in acquiring North Korean weaponry to bolster its military capabilities in the Ukrainian theater.

This pursuit is symbolic of a broader alignment of strategic interests among authoritarian regimes. The quest for advanced weaponry, often obscured from the public eye, further illustrates the aggressive postures adopted by these nations.

C. 2021 Reports on China Contemplating a Pearl Harbor-style Attack on the U.S.

The alarm bells rang louder when in 2021, reports surfaced regarding China contemplating a Pearl Harbor-style attack on the U.S.

If accurate, this would signify a chilling escalation in the military thought process, echoing audacious strategies of the past that led to large-scale devastations. It’s a grim reminder of the potential catastrophic outcomes when nations, emboldened by their military prowess, consider audacious strategies to assert dominance.

D. President Xi’s Delayed Condemnation of Hamas’ Assault post U.S. Pressure

The political nuances that often underpin military engagements and conflicts are evident in President Xi of China’s delayed condemnation of Hamas’ assault, which came only post U.S. pressure. The hesitation to condemn, followed by a reluctant condemnation under external pressure, underscores the complex political dynamics at play. This nuanced stance reveals a deeper narrative that extends beyond mere military engagements, into the realm of geopolitical maneuvering and the global chessboard of power politics.

IV. The Rise of Anti-Semitism and Propaganda

A. China’s Promotion of Anti-Semitism

Amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, China’s actions served to fuel anti-Semitic sentiments online, veering away from fostering any form of peaceful mediation. This behavior darkens the already ominous narrative threading through the fabric of global geopolitics, revealing a concerning stance that could potentially exacerbate existing tensions.

B. The Links Between the Republican Party and Russia, Particularly Through Former President Donald Trump

A worrisome camaraderie has been observed between some factions within the Republican Party and Russian interests. This rapport, starkly illustrated by former President Donald Trump’s amicable relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, not only erodes the foundational values of democracy but also has the potential to escalate into severe geopolitical tumult.

C. Fox News and Its Role in Disseminating Anti-Ukraine Propaganda

Fox News has been identified as a platform that has deviated from journalistic integrity by disseminating anti-Ukraine propaganda, aligning seamlessly with Russian objectives. This misinformation machinery fuels the flames of conflict, with the gears of propaganda being turned by falsehoods and distortions.

D. Tucker Carlson’s Promotion of Russian Interests and Connections to Hungary

A significant figure in this narrative is Tucker Carlson, whose promotion of anti-Ukraine and anti-democratic narratives has been substantial. The scenario is further complicated by his father, Dick Carlson, a lobbyist for Hungary—a nation known for its pro-Russia, anti-Ukraine, and anti-democracy stance. Such familial and ideological connections present a complex picture, revealing the interlinked networks that could potentially influence public opinion and, consequently, geopolitical dynamics.

E. Jack Hanick and His Association with Konstantin Malofeyev

Adding to the complex tapestry of connections is Jack Hanick, a former Fox News producer, who is known to have worked for Russian oligarch Konstantin Malofeyev. This association sheds light on the tangible ties between certain media personnel and foreign interests aiming to foster discord, thereby contributing to the broader narrative of propaganda and misinformation.

V. Political Dynamics and Military Readiness

Amidst a turbulent international landscape, the internal political dynamics within the United States play a crucial role in shaping the nation’s readiness and response to emerging global threats. A growing affinity for Russia among certain Republican Members of Congress, coupled with a concerted campaign to denigrate Ukraine and its leadership, highlights a concerning shift in political discourse. This section delves into these dynamics and their potential implications on military readiness and the broader geopolitical landscape.

A. Republican Members of Congress showing affinities for Russia

In recent times, a disconcerting trend has emerged within the United States’ political sphere, where certain Republican Members of Congress have shown a growing affinity for Russia. This inclination towards a nation known for its aggressive stance on the international stage sets a concerning precedent, revealing a deeper ideological shift that could have far-reaching implications on U.S. foreign policy and military readiness.

B. Denigration of Ukraine and its President by Fox and Republicans

Further extending the scope of concern is the continuous denigration of Ukraine and its President by certain factions within the Republican party and media outlets such as Fox News. This orchestrated narrative not only misrepresents the situation in Ukraine but also undermines the broader U.S. support for Ukraine at a critical time when solidarity against authoritarian aggression is imperative.

C. The Impact of Propaganda on American Perception and Support for Ukraine

The misleading narratives disseminated through certain outlets shape a skewed public perception, veering away from supporting Ukraine at a time when solidarity against authoritarian aggression is imperative. The impact of such propaganda extends to American perception and support for Ukraine, significantly swayed by the false narratives propagated.

D. Undermining of U.S. Military Readiness by Republicans, particularly through Tommy Tuberville’s Actions

One notable figure whose actions have come under scrutiny concerning U.S. military readiness is Senator Tommy Tuberville.

Known for his vocal criticism of China’s government, it was revealed that Tuberville had financial interests in a Chinese company with ties to the Communist Party, specifically, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Despite his advocacy for limiting U.S. investments in China, Senate financial disclosures indicated that he had between $15,001 and $50,000 in Alibaba stock put options.

However, upon becoming aware of this investment, Tuberville instructed his advisors to divest in the stock in early 2020, marking a proactive step to align his financial interests with his political stance against China’s government.

This scenario sheds light on the complex interplay between personal financial interests and political stances, which can, in turn, have implications on a lawmaker’s approach towards issues of military readiness and international relations. Tuberville’s actions, while rectified, highlight the broader issue of potential conflicts of interest that could inadvertently affect U.S. military readiness and foreign policy, especially at a time of escalating global tensions.

VI. The Shadow of War Looming over Taiwan

As the global community grapples with a multitude of crises, a menacing shadow looms over Taiwan, casting ominous forebodings of a potential military confrontation in the western Pacific. The intricate geopolitical interplays, fueled by China’s aggressive posture towards Taiwan, herald a perilous trajectory that could redefine the region’s security landscape.

A. China’s aggressive stance towards Taiwan amidst global distractions

In the midst of myriad global crises, China has amplified its aggressive stance towards Taiwan, a development that sends tremors through the international community. The rhetoric and military posturing have reached alarming levels, with the global distractions providing a veil under which threats against Taiwan intensify. This relentless aggression, left unchecked, threatens to plunge the region into a maelstrom of military confrontation with far-reaching consequences.

B. The potential fallout of a Chinese attack on Taiwan akin to the aftermath of Pearl Harbor

The spectral possibility of a Chinese assault on Taiwan isn’t mere conjecture but a looming reality that could trigger a cascade of events reminiscent of the aftermath of Pearl Harbor.

The historical parallel drawn here underscores the magnitude of a potential fallout, as the attack on Pearl Harbor served as a catalyst pulling the United States into World War II, altering the course of the conflict significantly.

A similar unprovoked assault on Taiwan could act as a catalyst, plunging the Indo-Pacific region, and possibly the world, into a state of war. The global stakes are exceedingly high, and the ripple effects would reverberate through the international community, affecting global trade, security alliances, and the overarching geopolitical landscape.

C. President Xi’s declaration of military action against Taiwan by 2027

In an uncharacteristically direct manner, President Xi Jinping of China declared a timeline for military action against Taiwan, setting a target of 2027. This announcement isn’t merely a break from the usually veiled threats but a clear message to the world of China’s ambitions and its willingness to pursue them aggressively. The date, 2027, now hangs over the region like a sword of Damocles, with each passing day tightening the noose of tension.

The military readiness of the countries in the Indo-Pacific region, as well as that of the United States and its allies, is being rigorously tested. China’s military, ramping up its capabilities and conducting exercises in the vicinity of Taiwan, sends a clear message of its assertive intent.


  • Alba, Davey, and Stuart A. Thompson. “‘I’ll Stand on the Side of Russia’: Pro-Putin Sentiment Spreads Online.” The New York Times, February 25, 2022.
  • Bennett, Bruce W. “North Korea, Russia and China: The Developing Trilateral Imperialist Partnership.” The RAND Blog, September 13, 2023.
  • Bildt, Carl. “The Axis of Outcasts.” Project Syndicate, September 18, 2023.
  • Chait, Jonathan. “The House GOP Has a Pro-Russian-War-Crimes Caucus.” New York Magazine, April 7, 2022.
  • Fedor, Lauren. “Pro-Putin Republicans Break Ranks by Heaping Praise on Kremlin.” Financial Times, March 26, 2022.
  • Gehrke, Joel. “Japanese Official Warns US of Potential Surprise Attack on Hawaii — from Russia and China.” Washington Examiner, June 30, 2021.
  • Greve, Joan E. “Hard-right House Republicans are Against Ukraine Aid – and They Seem to be in Charge.” The Guardian, October 14, 2023.
  • Harkov, Lahav. “Israel Learns the Hard Way that Russia, China are Not Its Friends.” Jewish Insider, November 1, 2023.
  • Jalonick, Mary Clare, and Lolita Baldor. “Republicans Confront Tuberville Over Military Holds in Extraordinary Showdown on Senate Floor.” AP News, November 1, 2023.
  • Kim, Hyung-Jin, Kim Tong-Hyung, and Jon Gambrell. “Evidence Shows Hamas Militants Likely Used Some North Korean Weapons in Attack on Israel.” AP News, October 19, 2023.
  • Kuo, Mercy A. “The China-Iran-Russia Triangle: Alternative World Order?” The Diplomat, July 7, 2022.
  • Lee, Christy. “China Exploits Israel-Hamas Conflict to Diminish US Global Influence, Analysts Say.” VOA News, October 13, 2023.
  • Levinthal, Dave, and Kimberly Leonard. “Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville is a Vocal Critic of China’s Government. He Also Owned Stock in a Chinese Company with Communist Party Ties.” Business Insider, June 28, 2021.
  • Lin, Bonny. “The China-Russia Axis Takes Shape.” Foreign Policy, September 11, 2023.
  • McCausland, Phil. “Trump Says He’s Pleased by Putin’s Praise: ‘I Like That He Said That’.” NBC News, September 15, 2023.
  • Michta, Andrew A. “US isn’t Ready for a War of Great Powers.” Politico, October 31, 2023.
  • Montini, EJ. “Tucker Carlson and Fox News Have Played the Part of Putin’s ‘Tokyo Rose’.” Arizona Republic, March 4, 2022.
  • Norris, Sian. “Tucker Carlson’s Visit to Hungary: Lobbying, Free Speech and Far-Right Conspiracy.” Byline Times, August 4, 2021.
  • O’Brien, Connor, and Joe Gould. “‘Putin will be Successful’ if Lawmakers Cut Ukraine Funding, Top Leaders Warn.” Politico, October 31, 2023.
  • Roth, Andrew. “Israel and Hamas at War – Live Updates.” The Guardian, October 26, 2023.
  • Shanahan, Ed, and Benjamin Weiser. “Ex-Fox News Producer Broke Law With Work for Russian Oligarch, U.S. Says.” The New York Times, March 3, 2022.
  • Stelter, Brian. “Biden Called Murdoch the ‘Most Dangerous Man in the World,’ New Book Alleges.” CNN Business, April 3, 2022.
  • Thompson, Stuart A. “How Russian Media Uses Fox News to Make Its Case.” The New York Times, April 15, 2022.
  • Wakabayashi, Daisuke, Tiffany May, and Claire Fu. “As China Looks to Broker Gaza Peace, Antisemitism Surges Online.” The New York Times, October 28, 2023.
  • Yamaguchi, Mari. “Japan Raises Alarm over China’s Military, Russia Ties and Taiwan Tensions in New Defense Paper.” AP News, July 28, 2023.