Ron Johnson Wanted A Tougher Border Bill. Once He Got It, He Withdrew Support
In a surprising turn of events reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson and several fellow Republicans have pulled back from a bipartisan agreement that sought to bolster U.S.-Mexico border security, simultaneously tying it to foreign aid provisions for Ukraine and Israel. This development underscores the ongoing struggle within the GOP to find a unified stance on border security, an issue they have long criticized Democrats for not addressing adequately.
Ron Johnson, known for his firm stance on linking Ukraine aid to stringent border security measures, became a pivotal voice against the proposed compromise, which aimed to address both foreign aid and border security in a single legislative package. Despite his previous advocacy for such a strategy, Johnson cited concerns that the legislation would inadvertently facilitate illegal immigration and compromise future efforts to secure the border.
Before the Senate’s procedural vote, which ended in a 49-50 decision halting the debate on the measure, Johnson articulated his apprehensions, stating, “It didn’t work because that bill in the end would have probably done more harm than good by normalizing a flow of illegal immigration and undermining a future president who actually wants to secure the border.”
The bill, praised by some for its comprehensive approach to border security—including measures to expedite asylum claim processing and empower the Department of Homeland Security to manage migrant influxes—faced premature dismissal by Republicans. The GOP’s abrupt withdrawal from the deal, even before its text was publicized, was influenced by external pressures, including criticism from former President Donald Trump and a declaration of non-support from House Speaker Mike Johnson.
Senator Kyrsten Sinema, an Independent from Arizona and a key figure in the negotiations, lamented the lack of Republican support shortly after the bill’s introduction, highlighting the missed opportunity for bipartisan progress on an issue of national concern.
Republicans’ rejection of the compromise, as depicted by the Journal Sentinel, seems to reflect broader tactical considerations, including the influence of Trump’s border security rhetoric and electoral strategies aimed at consolidating long-term political support. Johnson, in particular, has been vocal about his perception of Democrats’ immigration policies as efforts to secure votes through leniency, a claim he reiterated in discussions with the Journal Sentinel.
