Fox News host Tucker Carlson railed against what he described as an insidious plan by Democrats to “replace the current electorate” with “new people, more obedient voters from the Third World” during his show on Thursday.
“I know that the left and all the little gatekeepers on Twitter become literally hysterical if you use the term ‘replacement,’ if you suggest for the Democratic Party is trying to replace the current electorate, the voters now casting ballots, with new people, more obedient voters from the Third World,” Carlson said. “But they become hysterical because that’s what’s happening, actually. Let’s just say it! That’s true.”
“If you change the population, you dilute the political power of the people who live there,” he added later. “So every time they import a new voter, I’d become disenfranchised as a current voter. … Everyone wants to make a racial issue out of it. Oh, White replacement — No. This is a voting rights question. I have less political power because they’re importing a brand new electorate. Why should I sit back and take that?”
Bump noted that Carlson’s rhetoric is not only “dangerous and toxic” but also “ahistoric and ignorant.”
The reason that people get agitated by claiming that “the people who live here” — mostly White people — are being “replaced” is that this is a central tenet of white nationalist rhetoric. Specifically, it’s a framing about immigration that’s specifically meant to agitate racial animus: “They” are taking over, as surely as dirty foreigners named “Lombardi” from uncivilized lands were mucking up the U.S. late in the 19th century.
The “Lombardi” Bump references is Carlson’s own maternal great-great grandfather, who came to the U.S. in 1860.
Cesar Lombardi was 15 when he left his native Switzerland for the United States. He was Swiss but came from a town a few miles from the Italian border. He spoke only Italian and, in one of a series of letters he later wrote to his grandchildren, reports that he “felt like being deaf and dumb among people whose language I could not understand.”
“I also began to feel some of that desolate lonesomeness that comes of being completely out of relation with our surrounding,” he said of his arrival in New York.
Soon, though, he was on his way to family in New Orleans, a week-long journey by train that he reports overlapped with the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. Upon his arrival, he was sent to a Catholic school to learn English where he reports that “some of the boys disliked me because I was so different, I suppose, and teased me about my pronunciation and made life miserable for a time.”
He continued that immigrants “soon became the target of ferocious hostility from native-born Americans — including specifically those of Italian ancestry.”
They were seen as racially inferior to White northern Europeans and as a conduit for anarchism and Catholicism and socialism that undercut the United States. The largest mass lynching in American history occurred on March 14, 1891, when 11 Italian immigrants were pulled from a prison, shot and mutilated before a cheering crowd.
That occurred in New Orleans.
By then, Cesar Lombardi had already moved on to Texas. (He remained in Louisiana throughout the Civil War, where, he wrote, “[i]t was admitted, tacitly and otherwise, that the Slavery question was at the bottom of the difficulty, and the institution of Slavery was defended with vehemence, even in the pulpit” — though he “never became reconciled” to the owning of enslaved people.) He was also from a region near northern Italy, while much of the anti-Italian sentiment that emerged focused more heavily on those from the southern part of the country. It’s likely, then that he escaped much of the hostility. He thrived in his new country, as did his children and children’s children.
Image credit: Screengrab / @NikkiMcR / Twitter